What constitutes a breach of peace according to Nevada law?

In Nevada law, a breach of peace primarily involves actions that disrupt the public order or tranquility in a manner deemed disorderly or harmful to others. The correct answer points to maliciously disturbing the quiet with loud noises, which clearly fits this definition. This option indicates an intentional act to disturb others, showcasing malicious intent which is a critical factor in determining a breach of peace.

The emphasis on "maliciously" suggests that the act is not accidental or minor but is done with the purpose of causing disruption, making it a clear violation of peace. This aligns with legal standards that look for disruptive behavior that affects community harmony and safety.

Other options do not reflect the same level of intentional disruption or do not meet the threshold of a breach of peace. For instance, quietly disturbing a neighbor might not be perceived as significant enough to constitute a legal breach, and hosting a noisy party could be interpreted legally based on various factors, including location and time. A quiet argument, while possibly contentious, lacks the disruptive element required to be classified as a breach of peace under the law. Thus, the focus on malicious intent and the nature of disruption in the correct answer highlights the seriousness associated with that conduct in terms of maintaining public order.