Which scenario best outlines conditions that lead to a charge of kidnapping?

A charge of kidnapping is established when an individual is held or transported against their will. In this context, holding someone against their permission directly indicates that the person is not consenting to the situation, which aligns with the legal definitions and interpretations of kidnapping. The critical element here is the absence of consent, which is a cornerstone in many legal definitions of this crime.

In contrast, relocating someone during an emergency might happen under circumstances that suggest a necessity for their safety, and consent might not be explicitly violated. Transporting an individual with their agreement shows clear consent from the individual, thus eliminating the possibility of a kidnapping charge. Offering a ride to a stranger does not imply any sort of coercion or removal of consent; in fact, it often assumes that the individual is willingly accepting the offer. Therefore, the correct scenario that outlines conditions leading to a charge of kidnapping is the one where an individual is held without permission, reflecting a clear violation of their autonomy.